Department of Fair Trading Review of the Valuers Registration Act 1975 Final Report DEPARTMENT OF FAIR TRADING \ Review of Valuers Regulation Table of Contents Table of Contents I t.RM5 Of REfERENCE REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. THE REVIEW 1.1 Background to the Review vi xi 1 1 2 2 3 1.I.t Rationale for 1.1.2 ....... E;.'" ••,,' Review 1.2 Regulatory Systems 1..3 Conduct ofthe ReView 2. THE VALUATION 2.1 Current Regulatory 2.1.1 Entry Requirements 2.1.2 Disciplinary 2.2 Valuation in the P .." ...... 1v Market 2.3 Valuation - A Definition and the Role ofthe Valuer 4 . 4 5 5 6 3. REGULATORY ASSESSMENT ".1 KanOnlUe IOf KegUlittory Impacts 3.Ll Objectives 3.2 any Issues of Market Failure 8 Ii 8 9 9 10 3.2 .• Consumer Risks 3.2.2 Information Failure 3..3 Reg;ulaltory 1m..,,, ...,, 3.3.1 the Nature of the Restriction on Competitio 3.3.2 the identified restriction on competition and the economy 3.3.2.1 Barriers to and Cnmnp!p.n1'!V Standards 3.3.2.2 cOIl:catlion, 3.3.2.3 Vaillation Fees and Services 3.4 Need for Kt:l~IUlUlV'n 10 10 11 II II 12 3.4.1 Assess and Balance costslbenelits 3.4.1.1 Extent ofInformation 12 12 12 15 3.4.1.2 Markets Market Imperfections Review of Valuers Regulation Depanment of Fair Trading Table of Contellts 4. FORM OF INTERVENTION 4.1 Consideration of feasible alternative means for achieving the objectives, including non-legislative approaches 4.1.1 Net Public Benefit 4.1.2 Less Prescriptive Regulation - Negative Licensing 4.1.3 Conclusions and Future Directions 23 23 23 24 26 5. OTHER REGULATORY OPTIONS CONSIDERED FOR VALUERS 5.1 Maintain Existing Regulation 28 28 5.2 Once Only Registration 5.3 Self-Regulation 5.4 Remove Regulation 5.5 Co-Regulation 5.6 Professional Standard Scheme 28 29 29 30 30 Tables Table 3.1 - Consumer Redress and Discipline Mechanisms ............................................................. 17 Table 3.2 - Analysis of Complaints, NSW, 1992-93 to 1996-97 ........................................................ 18 Table 3.3 - Membership of Professional Associations (as at 12102/97) ............................................. 20 Appendices List of Submissions and Industry Briefing Sessions Valuation Transaction Model Stakeholder Requirement Model Summary of Regulation in Other Jurisdictions Appendix A Appendix B Appen.dix C Appen.dix D Page ii Review of Valuers Regulation Department of Fair Trading Steering Committee Membership Membership of the Valuers' Review Steering Committee Committee Members Mr Terry Downing - Department of Fair Trading (Chair) Mr Eric Prince - Eric Prince & Associates - Valuers, Newcastle Mr Craig Sahlin - NSW Cabinet Office Mr Peter Shields - NSW Treasury Mr Hugo Zweep - Zweep & ConnolJy Real Estate, Wollongong Ms Mary-Louise Battilana - Department of Fair Trading (Project Manager) Ms Lynne Murray - Department of Fair Trading (Policy Officer) Consultant to tbe Steering Committee Mr Richard Dougan - Australian Strategic Planning Pty Limited Mr Brian Watson - Sloane Cook & King Pty Ltd (Cost Benefit Analysis) Page iii Review of Valuers Regulation Department of Fair Trading Terms of Reference Terms of Reference for the Review 1rie lerrns of reierence for the review compiy with the NatlOnal COmpetltlOn t'nnClples Agreement which are as follows: 1. Clarify the objectives of the legislation and identify any issues of market failure which need to be addressed. 2. Identify the nature of the restriction. 3. Analyse the likely effects of the restriction on competition and the economy generally. 4. Assess and balance the costs and benefits of the restrictions identified. 5. Consider and propose alternative means for achieving the Government's objectives, including oonlegislative approaches. In assessing the costs and benefits of particular legislation, the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) agreed that the following matters, where relevant, be taken into account: government legislation and policies relating to ecologically sustainable development; social welfare and equity considerations, including community service obligations; government legislation and policies relating to matters such as occupational health and safety, industrial relations and access and equity; economic and regional development, including employment and investment growth; the interests of consumers generally, or a class of consumers; the efficient allocation of resources. II .. .. II II " the competitiveness of Australian business; and .. Pageiv Review of Valuers Regulation List of Abbreviations List of Abbreviations API ASREAV ATO AVO CGT COAG CPE/CPD GIS ICMV LGA NCC NCPA OSR PI REIofNSW RTA SVO VEETAC VRBQ V-G Austmlian v ..",..."' ..rv Institute (fonnally Australian Institute of Valuers and Land Economists) and Valuers Australian Australian Tax Australian Valuation Office Capital Gains Tax Council Continuing EducationlDevelopment Geographic Information ...",or",",,, Institute of Consulting Mortgage Valuers Ccr-oDI~mtlve Limited Local Government Authority National Council National Conll'1tetlltlOn Principles Agreement Professional Indemnity (insurance) Real Estate Institute of New South Wales Roads & Tmffic Authority State Valuation Office (NSW) Vocational and Training Advisory Committee of Queensland Note: Since the this Report minor have been incorpomted to name change of the Property Institute from Australian Institute and Land Economists and to references to the new Trading Tribunal which was estahlic:hecl on I March 1999. Page v Review of Valuers Regulation Executive Executive Sum Clarify the objectives of legislation which regulates the provision of valuation services The Valuers Registration Act 1975 seeks to ensure consumer and conduct within the valuation profession. through regulating standards The Act provides for an occupational land valuers. The Department registers valuers who have completed a course of study and have met practical experience requirements ~nT'T"'JPf1 by the Minister Trnding. Act defines a "real estate valuer" as a person who values land fee or reward payable either to him or to a person who employs in the of "'TTlr";"""'" or agent or in any other capacity. assessing the value The work of a valuer transactions where a purcbase is include considerntion of the location of the .....rr\nl>T'h, condition of the property. A valuer may act as a '"'v•..,"' ........ " town planners, architects, accountants, ",rl'"p,l"tv ....'I... "'n...''''' esp,ecl;all:y in the case of real property nnan<:lal institution. This work may ae"elcmrrlen£s in the area and the The regulation of valuers seeks to protect consumers UIl'JU~U.1 entry requirements which ensure that a person is of good character ...."', ..v .....".'" an approved course of study and a period of training in valuing land. ext>erien<:e requirements aim to protect vulnerable consumers and maintain aC(:eDtable V(Ul).(lUUH The Act also contains disciplinary r> ..... ~_l, which may be exercised against valuers who do not -..., .........r .. J ~ H,;th ............. ~ ;_~11C""""" .............................. J ('Ot~ ..... A"" ... ~(' LJ-..."'~""""'"' . 'T'hc:. .. "' •..., Identify any issues of failure that need to be addressed Valuation in Australia is based on the concept market value. Australian courts have had significant influence over the concept market value and the definitive statement of market value is generally regarded as that enunciated in the High Court case of Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia (1907) 5 CLR 418, which is known as buyer willing seller" concept A valuer's opinion "....,..,..."." particularly loan transactions. Valuers' opinions underpin many in such as insurance banks, building and nrn.nprnf trusts. Poor valuations could have adverse fmandal impacts on these institutions and their clients. The regulation the valuation information and available to a person; between providers 1-11I.11"""'''')!U is pre:Qlc:ate:d on an identified market failure: refers to the amount of information describes the imbalance of information Consumers generally may not possess the required to assess the ability of a valuer. also lack access to the lv~IW.I:vU to assess the ongoing performance or reliability valuer. vi Review of Valuers Regulation Executive The main sources of information failure likely to effect the II of II III in knowledge and information about valuers difficulty in selecting a valuer, reaching on the cpr""',·,, are supplied as agreed; and difficulty in distinguishing between a qualified and an to be ",rrlv,,1 ..l1 the a O(,£.IITS when 11 consumer h::l<; inslIffir:il':nt infnrmjltinn on whil'h tn h~~p' ::. np(';cinn rl'f1 the selection of a valuer, ie a valuer experienced in and therefore capable of the property in question, Without by providers into buying a good or not meet this may involve differing levels of and competency, so that it may be the consumer to judge the likelihood of obtaining adequate at the and lnfnrmlltion fllil11re Obtaining and processing information about the of the services and options for redress can increase transaction costs to the consumer. costs can inhibit informed decision making by consumers. In certain cases it can more cost effective the Government to lower trdDSaction costs by to consumers through various means. A regulatory scheme which to consumers that are to be of providing services of at least a minimum competency level, is such a case. However, the absence of "perfect information" is not evidence of market failure warranting direct government intervention in the ",,,,rlr,>tnl Information failure exists in cases where less than optimal levels of to persons in the market. Markets sometimes of own accord. It may be that the market is develop means for addressing market already taking some action to address a market or is capable doing so. For example, voluntary provision of information by professional and/or consumer or the establishment of voluntary accreditation and the use of quality assurance systems may assist In other cases, consumers may engage consumers to overcome some professionals to act on their behalf or they may buy Sometimes the existence of government to the of market responses. regulation is itself a significant Identify the nature of the restriction on competition The current operate in ways which provide the valuation may generalll1g oarners to entry, The current '"6'''''~''' are intended to exclude from the marketplace persons who do not consumer Occupational licensing, such as that for competition by limiting the supply of valuation services, conduct and busmess practIces WhlCfl add to costs. C0I10llt10YlS on market entrants, are creating may be shielded from competition. In the case .. completion of an "n",,'''''JPI1 .. completion of an aP[)[ol)ria:te III a person character Police checks are criminal convictions The approved courses are an ,,\1\.,... to establish whether they have had any ... rC' .......'" fulfilling the duties of a real estate valuer. of an applicant's competence in valuation. A of training ",;<:,." .... ll'ULll;",UVU Page vii Executive is undertaken so as to combine a practical knowledge of the property market with a thp,"r""~'''''' understanding of the market. For consumers there are two possible the pool of land valuers from which to choose is reduced as the entry requirements potential service providers from the marketplace. Secondly, there is the possibility that in a market where competition is restricted, prices may rise. Generally, the pwpose of licensing professional occupations is to assist consumers identify suppliers of the service them from or unsuitable providers. This is particularly true they require and where a consumer is unable to judge the of the being offered because it is technically complex or so rarely required that have DO or other to support a purchasing decision. Analyse the likely effed of any generally restriction on competition and the economy The restriction on competition vnl'IO.· ... Registration Act is !lot considered to impose any on the economy. as stated above, a registration regulatory system such as that for va1uers, can COflstrain For example capable persons can be disinclined to join a Drllle~;,slc'n u,; ....a,'u,:,<;; cost necessary to meet prescribed criteria. The coroUary of this is that the consumer have choice in the to oractice selection of one service provider over another. Currently in NSW and more than 200 in the valuatIon prcW'\nm1l'.<: .......'''''''lfJ'Ul'' each year. New entering the valuation over the last three years 80-200 per year. The number of service providers relative to the demand for can be an indication of the level competition. However, while the of a conducive to competition, it does not guarantee it The of ('n.nn,-T1I",,,n the ease of entry - by how contestable the market is. The valuation industry seems to be contestable, despite the existence of the re~nstration a person can operate in the va1uation industry, he or she must be a person completed an approved course of and have umler;gorle land. In recent years, the procedures for assessing whether a valuer is I.cU'''IJ'''L''''J''L of various land types have been streamlined, removing mapPlropnalte Before Furthermore, competency standards which are developed for industries to mClreal>e competitiveness and productivity of Australian industry through responsive reform education and training system, will be adopted by land valuers. specific knowledge and skill needed to be able to do a job, and focus on what is eXI)ected employee in the workplace rather than OIl the learning process. Competency-based is a more tle]UOle approach to vocational qualification because it meets the needs of individual learners and industry. Accordingly, the future adoption of competency standards for valuers will mean that the eligibility pmctice in the industry will relate more to the purposes and to identifiable to the in their dealings with valuers. Assess and balance the costs and benefits of the restrictions identified The of while genemJly effective in meeting consumer nr..'tPl't...·.T'I tends to be inflexible and imposes costs on the community. From the perspective of the wider the for maintaining the current level of regulation is that it produces a net so the ooncfits vut"weigh the cv5~. 11uo') iH\;a.U,;:, i1la~ ~JjJP~\.tjUt."Hi.a.i.~UU delivers a net public or social benefit or the least-costly burden to the Page viii Review of Valuers Regulation Department of Fair Trading Executive Summary However, the review has shown that under the existing system of regulation: • • • • with ordinary consumers rarely directly calling upon the services of a valuer; the level of complaints and disciplinary action required is low; other existing redress mechanisms are effective in meeting consumer needs; industry associations have raised and are continuing to promote industry standards and accountability amongst their members; and legislative intervention in the regulation of valuers is disproportionately high given the above characteristics. No significant changes have occurred in relation to the regulation of the activities of valuers since the introduction of the Valuers Registration Act in 1975. However, since then both the nature of the valuing profession has greatly changed and the importance of valuing to the business community has grown significantly. The valuation industry is also poised for fundamental change in the coming years in response to market demands - the increased use of technology will provide valuation solutions much more quickly, easily and cost effectively. Furthermore, financial institutions are adopting other assessment criteria for loan transactions which are likely to see a significant reduction in the number of valuations undertaken for loan purposes. The market characteristics of the valuation profession indicate a market that is developing mechanisms to address market imperfections of its own accord. Users have developed means of accessing and utilising information to gauge the quality and ability of valuers. Such assessments are formed on the basis of professional association membership, reputation, and on the strength of appropriate insurance cover. There is an extremely low incidence of complaints against valuers and formal disciplinary action has not been taken against a valuer for some time. This can be partly attributed to the high level of industry membership amongst valuers, and the practice of peer review which aims to maintain high standards within the profession. Also, other redress mechanisms and risk management tools are considered to be more effective in minimisation of risk. Professional indemnity insurance is a risk management device which benefits both valuers and clients. When people obtain information about potential service providers they are attempting to minimise the risk. Choosing someone with appropriate insurance is a strategy to maximise the possibility of recompense for unsatisfactory service. The clients of any professional person have expectations about the services they will receive and, in an increasingly litigious society, clients who hold that they have suffered loss or damage due to negligence, recklessness or incompetence, are likely to take legal action against that person in an attempt to obtain compensation. There is a high uptake of insurance by valuers and valuation firms because of these market imperatives. Further, the introduction of the Consumer Credit Code (NSW) Act 1995 bas significantly reduced the risk to those who most need regulatory protection. The code aims to discourage credit providers from aUowing debtors to tmknowingly overcommit themselves when taking out a loan. In the case of home loan borrowers, the code provides a mechanism by which the transaction can be reviewed and certain orders made if the transaction is found to be unjust. Another clear indication of the valuation market addressing market information needs is through the examination of the relationship between market participants and service providers. Members of the general public are not significant direct consumers of valuation services, and are essentially passive users. Where valuations are required for individual purposes, consumers are usually assisted by an intennediary. The majority of valuers' clients are banks, legal practitioners, fInance companies and Page ix Review of Valuers Regulation Department of Fair Trading Executive Sum.mary other financial intennediaries who seek a valuation as part of their loan assessment process. Valuations undertaken for home mortgage purposes represents the major segment of the valuation market. These primary users are therefore well placed to be aware of the general value of property being transacted. Any concerns such clients might have about valuations can be addressed by gaining further advice or further valuations. These are active and astute users who adopt sophisticated methods in the selection of valuers. They choose providers from panels of valuers whose performance has been monitored over time and who hold professional indemnity insurance. This user group also recognises the benefits of industry membership in relation to continuing education and professional development programs. These users are also able to further minimise their risk through appropriate mortgage insurance cover. Consider feasible alternative means for achieving the objectives, including non-legislative approaches J ""'" Pr ... "~!"lr.nve Reg!!!!!!!on - Negat!Ye L!!:ens!ng There is considerable scope for regulatory modification while maintammg appropriate levels of protection. One of the main objectives of the review of the Valuers Registration Act under the National Competition Principles Agreement was to look at more effective ways of carrying out the Act's objectives. The Review Committee considered that a system of "negative licensing", or regulation without registration, would provide an effective regime for the protection of consumers without the significant expense that traditional "positive licensing" regimes incur. This system would involve core legislation which provides for qualification and practice requirements and disciplinary action. The proposed scheme is similar to the regulatory approach introduced in South Australia in 1994 under the Land Valuers Act J994. There will no longer be a requirement for a valuer to be registered by the Department of Fair Trading. Instead, under a negative licensing scheme it would be an offence for a person to carry on business or purport to be a land valuer unless s/he holds certain prescribed qualifications or has been registered as a real estate valuer under the 1975 Act and has not been prevented from practising as a valuer in NSW or any other Australian jurisdiction. These requirements would include persons registered under the ]975 Act with any existing limitations on practice; or the completion of an approved course and a period of training; and for the flrst time the legislative framework will facilitate the recognition of the achievement of competency standards approved for valuers as a "pre-practice" requirement. Prescription of competency standards will form an essential part of the practice requirement and the standards to be prescribed will be those that constitute a risk to the public and which relate to regulated functions. In this way focus will move away from prescribing a particular educational course or subjects rather the standards themselves would be prescribed. This will allow flexibility to move to a competency based system where competency may be achieved through different pathways. AS well as eXClusion from practising m the indUStry, strong penalues would apply tor contraventlOn 01 these requirements. This regime would ensure that there is a minimum competency standard for entry " into the occupation of valuer, thereby excluding incompetent valuers. The system would include provisions aimed at protecting persons from unlawful, improper, unfair and incompetent practices of land valuers. Such behaviour would be subject to disciplinary action and a possible outcome of such disciplinary action could be that a person is barred from working as a land valuer. The threat of injunction from operating in the industry would operate as a severe and effective punishment and as an inducement to good conduct. Fines and reprimands would adversely affect professionals financially and in tenns of their reputation. Page x Executive system provides for appropriately educated, trained and the risk to consumers. It would continue to exclude area of enterprise, while leaving the fair and honest to carry on their activities with minimal intervention. Review of Valuers Regulation Depanment of Fair Trading Recommendations Recommendations The Review Committee recommends that a "negative licensing" scheme should replace the current system of regulation of valuers. The objectives of the scheme would be to protect persons from the incomnetent. unlawful or unfair practice~ of laml V:lillers. The <;chf'TTIf' wonkl h::lVP thp fnll",v;no features: (1) Definition of a Valuer A land valuer would be defined as a person who carries on a business that consists of: or involves valuing land. The definition would also include any person who formerly carried on such a business and hence, disciplinary proceedings could be taken against such a person. (2) Adminlslratioo of the Act It is proposed the Director-General, Department of Fair Trading would be responsible for the administration of the Act. (3) Qualifications requ ired to cany on business as a land valuer There will no longer be a requirement for a valuer to be registered before being able to practise. lnstead, it is proposed that the legislation state that a person may not carry on business or hold himselflberself out as a land valuer unless slhe: (a) possesses qualifications approved by the Minister to carry on business as a land valuer; or has been registered as a land valuer under the repealed Valuers Registration Act 1975 with any limitations on practice; or has not been convicted in NSW or elsewhere by any court of an offence involving dishonesty or been prohibited from acting as a land valuer in NSW or other Australian jurisdiction. (b) (c) At present, registration as a valuer depends on educational qualifications, experience and good character. These criteria are assessed by the Department of Fair Trading. Under the proposed scheme it would be incumbent on the valuer to ensure that s/he does not carry on the work of a valuer unless slbe meets the qualification requirements prescribed by the legislation. These requirements would mCJUoe persons regislerea under the j~75 Act with any eXISting linutatlOns on practice lcurrently under the Act, limitations on a valuer's registration can be imposed as to location and land type); or the completion of an approved course and a period of training; or the achievement of competency standards approved for valuers, or other approved qualification. The current requirement for a person to satisty the Director-General that slbe is of good character would be replaced by the requirement that slbe has not been convicted in NSW or elsewhere by any court of an offence involving dishonesty, or been prohibited from acting as a land valuer in NSW or other Australian jurisdiction. (4) Complaints Any person may make a complaint to the Director-General of the Department of Fair Trading about the conduct of a land valuer or person holding themselves out as a land valuer. (5) Investigation of Complaints The Director-General would be responsible for investigating complaints, and any person may submit to the Director-General matters alleged to constitute grounds for disciplinary action under the Act. The Director-General may investigate the conduct of persons whether or not there has been a complaint Page xii Review ofYaluers Regulalion Recommendations made against those persons. The authorised person/so powers may be delegated to an (6) Cause for Disciplinary Action Disciplinary action could be taken against a person in the following circumstances: 1. Where the person practises, advertises or holds hirnselflherself out as being entitled, or prepared to practise as a land valuer without complying with the qualification requirements of the legislation. Where the land valuer, or any themselves out as a land valuer, has acted unlawfully, unfairly or mCIDffilpeti::ntlly in the course of conducting or being employed or otherwise engaged ill the land valuation. bre:aclled a accepted by the of the Act or acted contrary to an undertaking 2. 3. !!!c!ude 2 ..,.-""ne,,,.... requirements setting out the behaviour of valuer's qualifications, any of interest and in the best interests requirements would be developed in conjunction with industry. (7) Disdplina ry Action A range of mechanisms would be available to ensure the appropriate resolution of the issue in \.1.,\"1' ...,...... Where it appears to the that a valuer or any other person purporting to a land valuer has engaged in conduct concern under the Act, the Director-General may request tllat that person execute a deed of to discontinue the particular conduct. Such conduct would include those matters which action as outlined in (6) above. Where a person executes a deed and to observe the undertakings in the deed the Director-General may take further disciplinary The VII'eClor-1 in such a case, may: (a) (b) (c) (d) reprimand the person; pra,ctlce; or of a land valuer or employment or in the perma:nently, for a period, until the ' ..... Appropriate penalties would contravenes a prc,bitliticm action under the the Director-General to .... U,VB,'" Prohibition could UHI....." . "LlI-' ............... conditions, where a person be by (8) Register of Disciplinary Action It is proposed that the Director-General would keep a register of ....."""1-",,.......... person under the and make a notice on the register of any UuectOf-(jeneral III reiahon to a land valuer. (9) Appeals A person who is the of an made by the Director-General may tribunal, namely the Administrative Decisions Tribunal against the order. to an maeptmaent Review ofYaluers Regulation Recommendations rofE~ssional COltlfumil1lg pl,ore:ss!()nal Development development would Dot be a pre~-c(mClm()fl to carry on business as a valuer. (11) Dre:-ccmdltlCID to carry on business as a valuer. Page xiv